Dedicated to representing health providers.

Federal Court Denies Motion to Compel Production of Peer Review Documents Based on State Law Privilege

Area of Law:
Civil Rights 42 U.S.C. §1983

Venue:
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan (2016)

Verdict:
Motion to Compel Denied

Details:
The family of a deceased Michigan Department of Corrections inmate sued several corrections officers and medical providers alleging that these defendants failed to provide adequate treatment for the inmate’s asthma. During the discovery phase of the case, Plaintiff requested that the Defendants produce copies of any investigations or reviews created in connection with the inmate’s death. We objected on behalf of the medical providers based on Michigan’s peer review privilege. and Plaintiff filed a Motion to Compel, arguing that a state law privilege did not apply in federal court. The Court denied Plaintiff’s motion, opining that the 6th Circuit has applied Michigan’s state law privilege broadly. See Lloyd v. Saint Joseph Mercy Oakland, 766 F.3d 580 (6th Cir. 2014). As a result of the 6th Circuit’s decision in Lloyd, the federal district court had no choice but to deny Plaintiff’s motion.t.

Attorneys:
Ronald Chapman
Carly Van Thomme
Kevin McQuillan


Disclaimer:
This information is a sample of our past results. Prospective clients may not obtain the same or similar results. Every case is different and each case must be evaluated and handled on its own merits. The circumstances of your case may differ from the results provided. The information provided has not been reviewed or approved by the Florida Bar.


Let Us Help You Now
  • Disclaimer