Helping health professionals for over 25 years.

Timothy Norris v Client

Area of Law:
Civil Rights 42 U.S.C. §1983

Venue:
US District Court – Western District of Michigan

Verdict:
Judgment in Favor of Clients

Details:
Plaintiff brought a suit claming that client was deliberately indifferent to his medical need. Plaintiff crushed his finger in a cell door and was seen by client on two occasions to receive pain medicine and change dressing. Plaintiff never complained to client about pain. In order to claim deliberate indifference you must show two elements: 1) that defendant was aware or should have been aware of a serious medical need, and 2) that defendant, being aware of that need, acted with deliberate indifference. It was shown to the jury that client was given pain medicine and did not complain of pain to client. Therefore client was not aware of a serious medical need and did not act indifferent. Jury rendered a verdict in favor of our client.

Attorneys:
Ronald Chapman
David Mammel
Brian Richtarcik


Disclaimer:
This information is a sample of our past results. Prospective clients may not obtain the same or similar results. Every case is different and each case must be evaluated and handled on its own merits. The circumstances of your case may differ from the results provided. The information provided has not been reviewed or approved by the Florida Bar.


Let Us Help You Now
  • Disclaimer