Dedicated to helping health professionals.

Federal Prosecutors Dismiss Charges Against West Virginia Pain Managment Physician


Federal Prosecuters Dismiss Charges on Pain Management Physician, Anesthesiologist, Medication Assisted Treatment (MAT) Program Provider, Suboxone/Buprenorphine prescriber.

Primary Issue:

federal prosecutors pillsChapman Law Group was retained by a West Virginia owner of a pain management, addiction medicine practice accused of drug trafficking and healthcare/Medicare fraud, wire fraud, and mail fraud.

The physician prescribed suboxone/buprenorphine as part of a medication-assisted treatment program and also provided pain management treatment including interventional procedures. The physician was alleged to have unlawfully prescribed to patients, pre-signed prescriptions, permitted staff to issue prescriptions for controlled substances, and committed Medicare fraud and Medicaid fraud.

Essentially, Federal Prosecutors alleged that the practice was a “pill mill” and committed health care fraud.


After being retained by the client, we began investigating the “pill mill” and health care fraud allegations and eventually engaged in negotiations with the government after providing the prosecutor’s information about the error of its unlawful prescribing (“pill mill”) allegations.

The government agreed to remove the unlawful prescribing allegations from the indictment but declined to resolve the remaining 32 health care fraud charges. After the Government made the decision to indict, we aggressively fought the charges and filed two separate motions to dismiss.

federal prosecutors healthcare

The first motion was filed because the Government improperly reviewed our client’s privileged attorney-client email messages. While the motion was ultimately denied, it was clear that it raised a significant appellate issue. The second motion to dismiss was filed after the Government disclosed that it failed to review 100,000 files which were not disclosed until a week prior to trial.

The government’s theory of the health care fraud case was that the physician billed for patient visits using the code 99214 and 99215 without seeing the patients. We obtained two experts who were prepared to testify that the “incident to” rules for Medicare and West Virginia Medicaid rules permit billing for services of support staff, including nurses.

In essence, this was not healthcare fraud and was permitted by regulations. Also, we obtained an expert pain management and suboxone prescriber who was prepared to testify that the method in which this physician ran the suboxone program was completely permissible.

Just prior to trial, the Government agreed to dismiss the health care fraud charges.